The third generation RDX is the quickest, best-handling RDX ever, with top- class cabin and cargo space, and a host of groundbreaking new Acura technologies.

Opinion: does the D-pillar “side-line” add to or detract from car design? [w/ poll]

As the 2018 New York Auto Show develops two recent trends have come to the fore: the D-pillar “side-line” and the move towards free-standing infotainment screens. Here, we’ll look at the former, evident in new cars such as Acura RDX, Nissan Altima and Toyota RAV4. Clearly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and everyone will have their own personal take on the side-line, but seeing as this is one of the car design trends of the recent years I figured we’d try to look at whether this will be one of those things that we remember fondly when we look back at car design (chrome bumpers, 1960s-style fins on American cars, pop-up headlamps) or one that will make us cringe (fake exhaust tips, fake wood panelling, vinyl roofs, 1980s digital car displays). 

The case “for”

When well executed, the line connecting the side and the rear windows can really add to a car’s dynamic appearance. An example of this is the new Acura RDX (above), whose D-pillar line is an extension of the receding line of its side windows, and merges seamlessly into the bottom of the rear glass. Thanks to this solution, the RDX has a dynamic profile reminiscent of the discontinued ZDX without the compromises forced by that car’s roof also receding quickly towards the back. 

Another way in which the side-lines can be beneficial to a car’s appearance is that, if the car comes with the trendy option of the roof being a different color than the body, the side-lines can help draw a line between the two where the body shape does not provide any natural creases. This can help the whole effect look more natural, as is in the case of the new Toyota RAV4 (below) or the Seat Arona, compared to just having the two colors touch in the middle of a C-pillar, say (think Skoda Fabia Mk III, or Renault Captur). 

The case “against”

Unfortunately, it seems that car designers can’t always help themselves, and apply the C-pillar side-lines to cars where they don’t really belong, in the hope that this will add interest or dynamism to what is otherwise a pretty ordinary shapes. By far the biggest culprits here are Nissan, who applies this visual cue to all sort of models, from the large Murano and Maxima, down to the small Leaf Mk II, and now again on the new Altima. While the end result is pretty pleasing on the Murano, the same cannot be said of the Maxima or Altima, where the strip looks like a piece of black tape someone forgot to remove from the car, or the Leaf, where it looks contrived and ill-fitted.

So, how will the side-line be remembered?

Like many design trends, there are cases where the side-line can enhance the appearance of a vehicle – such is the case, to these eyes, of the new Acura RDX, the Opel Astra or, to a certain extent, the new Toyota RAV4. Unfortunately, often designers try to force this faddish design details onto cars where they simply don’t belong, such as Nissan’s efforts with its sedans, or on smaller cars where the side-lines are unnecessarily cramped and end up looking unnatural, such as Nissan Leaf. On balance, it is one design detail we will probably look back and wonder “what were they thinking?”, though it would be unfair to say all cars so adorned look bad. And this trend is still nothing compared to Jaguar’s efforts to black out the rear pillar on the XJ and XK Sportwagon Mk I, a hideous idea that the company luckily quietly dropped for the F-Pace and latest XK Sportwagon. 

What do you think of the D-pillar side-line?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  1. I choose option D: depends on whether it’s well executed.
    .
    All lines on a car, including the D-pillar side-line, need to be a natural part of the entire design. It should not interfere with other lines nor separate itself from the car. I don’t like it on the new Toyota RAV4 (my goodness, what a hideous car!), Seat Arona, VW T-Roc and current Opels. On these models, the line seems to be adrift and too much ‘in your face’ and therefore distracts in a negative way. The above-mentioned Acura RDX as well as the Lexus RX, Nissan Murano and Renault Espace have well-executed (i.e. fluent) D-pillar side lines. Each in its own way of course.

  2. I have to disagree with one thing: I’m fond of vynil roofs, and I think they brought more interest to rather boring designs of that era like the Chrysler 180 or even the Morris Marina, but maybe that’s just me…

    Regarding these tapes, I don’t like them, most of them don’t blend well with the design of the car and I think its a way of designers to bring something new to the what are, basically, the same shapes that have been used in car designs for decades.

  3. As vehicles become taller, wedge profiles become accentuated, designers have had a problem with the side rear view of their vehicles. They appear bulky. There is too much metal between the rear wheel arch and the window. Designers have been doing their best with exaggerated wheel arches (Fiat 500L), wrap around tail lights (Land Rover Discovery), or metal folds (Mahindra KUV100). The new strategy is Distraction, i.e. the D-Pillar side-line. My problem is it encourages over-the-shoulder blind-spots and dark & child-unfriendly rear interiors.
    And I love vinyl roofs. Two-tone roofs are a poor substitute!

  4. I took a pair of minutes thinking about a car with this “feature” that I like…. but I don’t found anyone.

    So, for me is a very bad idea.

  5. It’s known as the floating C pillar (or D) The idea is to trick the eye into thinking the pillar is non-continuous.
    As a new idea, it’s not bad when well executed. Nissan has done it well, and so has BMW on a limited basis.
    I doubt it’ll have a long design life before it becomes a cliché.

  6. Ha, since all these SUV CUV vehicles with a liftgate (rear access, fifth door, rear hatch……whatever you want to call it), are at base a……………….station wagon, or an alternative to a minivan. For hauling people and things the best compromise between interior space and exterior size is the classic station wagon or a minivan. Everything else is a compromise and requires the designers to make their vehicle look “cool”, which results in exterior bulk, attempts to disguise the bulk, and reduced interior space and function. No wonder sales of pickup trucks continue to grow because they still emphasize function over form…….no over styled D pillar on a pickup truck.

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.