Geneva Autoshow 2017: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly production cars, part 2

After discussing the Alpine A110, DS7 Crossback, Ford Fiesta, Kia Picanto, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and Opel/Vauxhall Crossland X in part 1, we’ll continue with the second bunch of Geneva launches. Let us know what you think and vote for your favorites below!

Opel/Vauxhall Insignia

Bart: hot

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Opel_Insignia_Grand_SportSee, they do now how to design a great looking car at Opel/Vauxhall, as the new Insignia proves. Wow, this thing looks more capable then ever to steal each and every one of those 12 private sales annually from the Passat. The rest of the sales in this segment are corporate orders from leasing companies, some of which limit their client’s choices, which means even if the Insignia is the better (and better looking) car, not everyone who wants one will be able to get it. Too bad, because its low and wide proportions and almost coupe-like roofline of the hatchback absolutely make this one of the best looking cars in the segment, right up there with or maybe even ahead of the Renault Talisman and miles ahead of the dull Passat and already long-in-the-tooth Mondeo. Who could’ve said that of an Opel just a few years ago? The Americans are drooling over this thing to make it Stateside again as the Buick Regal (including the Wagon) and that’s actually pretty impressive for a brand that’s been known as a maker of uninspired middle-of-the-road cars for decades.

Kriss: hot

I can see that Bart really, really likes the new Insignia, and it’s not hard to see why. For starters it is a really good-looking car, with great proportions (for a FWD car) and nice, sharp detailing, even if personally I prefer the previous-generation model, as well as the latest Passat. The interior is pretty nice too, though personally I wonder if the central console is as nice in a mid-sized car as it is in the compact Astra or compact crossover Crossland X. Ultimately though, while I can’t think of what more Opel could have done for the Insignia, I don’t think this car can do better than to regain a distant-second to the Passat in European sales.

Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo

Kriss: so-so

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Porsche_Panamera_Sport_TurismoWhen Porsche showed off the Sport Turismo concept five (!) years back I started salivating on the spot – here was this amazing wagon, a genuinely great-looking 5-door Porsche – in essence, everything the first-generation Panamera was not. But before then and now, when Porsche debuted the production version of the wagon Panamera, two things happened. First, five years passed, an eon in car design. Second, Porsche came out with the second-generation Panamera liftback, clearly inspired by the Sport Turismo concept, which is one hell of a good-looking machine. Suddenly, by comparison, the Panamera Sport Turismo is no longer quite the stunner the concept was, partly because production reality dulled the shape (especially around the back, and in detailing of the flanks), but mostly because the shape is ultimately a bit weirdly-proportioned: not long enough to imitate classic, British “shooting brakes”, or to really, truly look like a wagon. If anything, the Sport Turismo reminds me of these cars that are in-between a hatchback and wagon models, like the Subaru Impreza wagon or Mazda 323F from the late 1990s, or the Audi A3 Sportback.

Bart: hot

Porsche must’ve thought: if you can’t beat them at their own game, change the game. The Panamera was always too sporty to be a real limousine that would rival the S-Class or 7-Series, but it did carve out a pretty impressive niche for itself as the driver’s car in a segment that assumed the buyer would be chauffeured. The second generation Panamera smoothed out the rough edges in the design, but now Porsche wants to be a pioneer in this segment again by launching a shooting brake version of the Panamera. Well, technically a shooting brake would have two doors and a rear hatch while the Sport Turismo has four doors and a hatch, but what else would you call it? It’s not a real wagon and Mercedes-Benz uses the monniker for its CLS hatchback too. I find the Sport Turismo much more visually appealing than the regular Panamera and its added practicality may even mean this will be the most popular version by a large margin. My guess: the next generation Panamera will be available in this version only, they won’t even bother with a sedan (hatchback?) anymore.

Range Rover Velar

Bart: hot

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Range_Rover_VelarAnother Range Rover? Another brand following the same-sausage-different-size strategy? Well, not exactly. The Velar isn’t just more of the same. This is one very sleek looking SUV with the hidden door handles and the high beltline/low roofline giving it an intimitating appearance. And there is room in their line-up between the Evoque and the RR Sport, so why not fill it with something sexy? The Velar will have premium pricing (even more so than its siblings) and will compete with top-of-the-line versions of the Porsche Macan and Jaguar F-Pace, although those models are more sporty than the Velar. The only thing that annoys me about the design is how the black line under the doors and in the rear bumper doesn’t break smoothly at the rear wheels.

Kriss: hot

My first reaction to the Velar was much like Bart’s – does the world really need another Range Rover? Luckily, the Velar turned out to be much more than just a “Range Rover Sport Coupe”, a moniker the internet adopted for the model which suggested it would just be the X6 to Range Rover Sport’s X5. If anything, the Velar makes the RR Sport looks old and badly-proportioned, and the Evoque less-than-special. I love the car’s exterior, both in the proportions (look at the size of those wheels!) and in the detailing, while the interior finally seems to move the stodgy RR interior design into the future. I am happy for this to be the future of Range Rover, I just hope the carmaker can make sense of the rest of its portfolio around the Velar – it truly deserves to be the centerpiece.

Seat Ibiza

Kriss: hot

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Seat_IbizaThe Ibiza was the harbinger of change for Seat – it was the first modern-day Seat in the pre-VAG days, with its Porsche-fettled engines, and then the following generation was the first model developed on a VAG platform shared with another model (VW Polo). Unfortunately, over the following two generations the Ibiza lost its edge, first gaining ungainly curves, and then ungainly edges. Luckily, the fifth-generation makes up for that – taking advantage of the MQB A0 platform it manages to look wide and squat, with proportions that are, to these eyes at least, better than on any of its competitors. Sure, the exterior looks a ton like the Leon, but given that the big-bro is one of the best-looking cars in its segment that is a good thing. If the Ibiza can take full advantage of the advanced new platform, delivering a sporty-ish ride with immaculate composure, Seat might be onto a real winner here.

Bart: hot

I don’t agree with Kriss that the Leon is one of the best looking cars in its segment, and I’m really starting to get tired of the evolutionary design within the VW Group. On the other hand I totally understand why they do this and it seems to be working for them. In fact, think they’ve addressed exactly all the design flaws of the old Ibiza and have made the new one look so much better now, especially from the rear which indeed looks wide and squat. So after my first impression of “What’s new? – so-so” I’ve had to reconsider and give it a hot because I agree they may have a winner here. The Ibiza should be able to give the Skoda Fabia a run for its money again.

Suzuki Swift

Bart: so-so

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Suzuki_SwiftNow that Suzuki has the Baleno to appeal to the value-for-money crowd, that leaves room for the Swift to shift more towards the sporty side of the segment. The design is evolutionary, keeping the general proportions intact as well as the signature floating roof. And I like the broad shoulders above the wheel arches that give it a more muscular look. The front end of the Swift Sport takes more than a few clues of the Jaguar F-Type, but it somehow looks bit messy to me in both the Sport and the regular version. A bit like the way it looks when they try to make a corporate grill fit into an existing design during a facelift. Keeping in mind the Swift sells four times as many units in India than in Europe (plus even more of the sedan version Dzire), I can imagine their tastes are more important than those of Europeans. I think the overall design is a bit too Asian for most European buyers, although it will have its fans. Besides, the Swift nameplate has built up a sizeable amount of brand equity in the past decades so there’s certainly a market for it here. On the other hand, it has got some of the most impressive technology available in its class, with optional adaptive cruise control, auto emergency braking, high beam assist, a mild hybrid system and four wheel drive. Pretty impressive!

Kriss: not

I was a huge fan of the reinvented Swift, two generations back. Small, light, with timeless classy looks – it was in many ways more the modern-day successor to the original Mini than its bloated successor has been. Unfortuntely, the model’s progress since then has been… well, to me it has gone decidedly backwards. The looks are now like an overdrawn pastiche of that great model two generations back, the car has gained weight, the interior has become fussier without, seemingly, gaining much in quality. Not Suzuki’s finest hour…

VW Arteon

Bart: so-so

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Volkswagen_ArteonVW can even make a four-door coupe look boring with its industrial design. The Arteon’s basic lines are very sexy and the rear end also looks great with the integrated spoiler and the pronounced hips above the rear wheels, but why couldn’t they make the front end a bit more aggressive? Then again, Volkswagen knows exactly what its customers want and I guess aggressive design is not on the list. Then what do they want? A well-built and luxurious interior full of the latest gadgets, that’s for sure. I guess they want a Passat but their colleagues already have those so they need something similar that sets them apart from (and above) the crowd. In that perspective the execution is excellent.

Kriss: so-s0

I guess Bart is correct about the Arteon’s raison d’être, but for me that is not a bad thing – when done right, it gives us cars like the CLS or A7, which no one begrudges their roots in the “regular” E-series or A6. And get it wrong and you could get the Opel Signum… ugh, shudder. The Arteon is pretty nice, though no more than that – the step change compared to the Passat is much smaller now that the latest Passat is a good-looking model (unlike its predecessor), and there is definitely something “off” about the front end. Still, as a “budget A7” I think the Arteon is pretty great, and should sell for a nice profit for VW.

Volvo XC60

Kriss: hot

2017-Geneva_Auto_Show-Volvo_XC60There is no two ways about it – for me, the XC60 goes straight to the top of the segment for me in the desirability stakes. Its looks do a great job of combining the dynamic stance of the F-Pace, the confident elegance of the GLS, and the chiseled detailing of the Q5. The interior is a stunner, and immediately makes the GLC’s look last-year, the Q5’s like an austere sketch done exclusively with a straight ruler, and don’t even mention the F-Pace. The only outstanding question is whether the (almost too pronounced) cab-backward looks harms the XC60’s interior space, but even if it’s not the biggest model in the class, I predict the new XC60 will grab the segment crown in 2018 once production hits full stride.

Bart: hot

Volvo can’t seem to do wrong with its Swedish design these days. Simple yet elegant and luxurious without being in-your-face. The first generation XC60 has had a very successful career with over 450.000 sold in Europe. It became the brand’s best seller its 8th year on the market with record volume of almost 83.000 sales and was the first Volvo to beat its German rivals in Europe. Even as the competition is heating up, the new generation will undoubtedly build on that strong foundation as it once again takes many design cues from the larger XC90 without looking like just a smaller version of that model.

Which are your favorites of the Geneva Auto Show 2017? (up to 3 answers possible)

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  1. I love the Insignia. And although I’m not normally a fan of VW design, I have to say I really like the Arteon… probably because it reminds me a little of the Talisman in some aspects 😉
    The Porsche, Velar and Volvo also look very aesthetic! Can’t wait to check them out by myself in the “flesh” this week-end…

  2. Insignia – so-so: the hatchback is elegant and one of the best looking D-segment cars. However, the stationwagon still seems to be ‘fat’ like the outgoing model and the upper window line needs an instant facelift. Very weird, just like the Adam/Astra Sports Tourer/Crossland X.

    Panamera Sport Turismo – not: they should’ve made a true Estate or Shooting Brake instead, because the only purpose of the Panamera ST is to make more money by filling another non-existing niche. This car doesn’t offer significantly more room for passengers and their luggage. You can even buy it with 4 seats, same as the Panamera. About the design, Kriss was spot on: “a bit weirdly-proportioned”.

    Velar – so-so: Land Rover borrowed the Jaguar F-Pace. The Range Rover is stylish and robust at the same time. This thing is too ‘soft’. By the way, there is already a car between the Evoque and RR Sport and it’s called the Discovery Sport. The Velar is yet another money-maker. I prefer the real deal: Range Rover.

    Ibiza – so-so: honey, I shrunk the Leon! In my opinion it always degrades larger cars when family members are smaller copies (e.g. S-class vs. C-class). I can understand some sort of resemblance between cars of the same brand, but it’s time for a lot of designers to get rid of Audi’s copy machine. Start stimulating our senses again, think out-of-the-box, try multiple designs, do something!

    Swift – not: see, this is what you get when designers aren’t allowed or don’t dare to think out-of-the-box anymore. The new Swift looks like the old one with a couple of modern Suzuki details. Result: a clownish little car. Totally agree with Kriss on this one.

    Arteon – so-so: Skoda has made VW redundant, but of course a lot of people (are forced to) drive VWs because of the logo. So now it’s time for VW to mimic Audi and Porsche? I thought Seat was supposed to be the budget-Audi? Besides, why on earth would they use the same interior (this picture shows the inside of the Sport Coupe GTE Concept) as the regular Passat? I know, it’s a VW so you pay more for the same or less (in comparison), but for me it’s fooling the customer.

    XC60 – so-so: better proportioned than the XC90, but it doesn’t have the same combination of robustness and distinction like the outgoing model. Nevertheless, Volvo owns this segment, because most of the competitors are ‘cheap’. The Swedes are not making that mistake.

    1. Hi Losange,
      good call on the Arteon interior. Fixed it! And indeed a missed opportunity to add more value to the model by giving it a stunning interior.

      I can see most of your arguments, but what I don’t understand is your criticism of models that are designed “just to make money”. Since you seem to agree than JLR will make a bunch of money on the RR Velar, it’s a no-brainer for them to make it. Of course they will build whatever the customers will buy, they are in the business of making money, after all. And I don’t think the Panamera Sport Turismo or the Velar hurt their respective brands by spreading them too thin in a way the Jeep Patriot might have.

      1. Hi Bart,

        Of course, every car has to earn money, but in my opinion many luxury brands have leveled their portfolio without looking at the purpose of the car. They just know people want to buy them, because of the logo these cars carry. The Velar isn’t that different compared with the RR Sport and the Panamera ST is nothing more than a Panamera Hatch minus the practicality of a decent hatchback. First impressions on different media state it’s above all a car for people who don’t like the look of the regular Panamera. In a way, I should be happy about this, because whoever buys a Porsche for lots of room on the back seat or a large boot should hand in their driving-licence 😉

  3. I really don’t see what you guys see in the Insignia. It’s too big for its own good, not as good looking as it’s predecessor and the detailing… seriously, fake windows? In a car that’s supposed to be fighting the premium cars? The Caravan… sorry, ” Sports Tourer ” at least looks better than the hatch but still… imo it’s going to do about as well as the Mondeo.

    The Arteon is interesting. I was all prepared to not like it, but in person, it kinda has it’s charms. And the dash may be the same as the Passat, but, dear Lord this car is spacious. Like limo spacious in the back seats. I was pleasantly surprised by it ( probs still wouldn’t buy one though ).

    The XC60 and the Velar where my 2 favorite ” real ” cars from the show. Judging by the number of people that where around them ( i was at the show for 6 hours. There where lines to get in these 2 the whole time ) they’re going to sell like hotcakes. The DS7… not so much.

    The Alpine A110 just makes you want to have one. It’s insanely pretty.

    And my biggest disapointments; Citroens ridiculous stand ( 6 cars in total, 3 of them C3s. I actually missed it at first ) and the new Honda Civic, which now just feels really American, ie cheap and somehow unfinished. OTOH, for comparison, Honda had more Civics than Citroen had cars in total, and they had 3 Civic Type Rs ( it looks like a 12 yo designed it ).

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.