Auto-sales-statistics-China-Bisu_T5-SUV

Bisu T5 China Sales Figures

Bart Demandt
Bisu Car SalesBisu Model SalesCar Sales China
3

Auto-sales-statistics-China-Bisu_T5-SUVMonthly and annual sales figures for the Bisu T5 in China.

Car sales statistics from China only include domestic production and exclude imported models.

 

Bisu
T5
2017
Bisu
T5
2018
Bisu
T5
2019
Bisu
T5
2020
January 3.367 728 30
February 3.367 685
March 17 3.176 431
April 46 2.676 312
May 2.451 334
June 3.033 1.367 376
July 3.115 1.185 246
August 3.170 842 189 5
September 3.461 866 102 23
October 3.614 831 99 39
November 3.726 874 59
December 4.764 1.187 61

Bisu
T5
2020 97
2019 3.622
2018 22.189
2017 24.946

 

Sources: Manufacturers, Chooseauto.

Bisu
T5
2017
Bisu
T5
2018
Bisu
T5
2019
Bisu
T5
2020
January 3.367 728 30
February 3.367 685
March 17 3.176 431
April 46 2.676 312
May 2.451 334
June 3.033 1.367 376
July 3.115 1.185 246
August 3.170 842 189 5
September 3.461 866 102 23
October 3.614 831 99 39
November 3.726 874 59
December 4.764 1.187 61

Bisu
T5
2020 97
2019 3.622
2018 22.189
2017 24.946
Tags
Bart Demandt
Bart is a 36-year old Dutchman who's always had a thing for cars, the automotive industry and statistics. He’s combined these passions by writing about them on CarSalesBase.com. His daily driver is an Alfa Romeo GT 3.2 V6 which he just can't seem to say goodbye to thanks to the mesmerizing exhaust note, despite approaching 300.000km which probably makes this the most experienced GT 3.2 in the world. You can find all his articles Here.
Related

3 Comments

  1. I noticed that the Jan. and Feb. sales data points for the Bisu T5 are the exact same number, at 3367??? That seems highly unlikely. Would it be possible to check that w/ original source (CAAM), or whatever the original source is?

    Reply

    1. That’s a good observation, John. In fact, Bisu’s reported sales for all of its models are similar for February and January. Not sure if this is a glitch in the reporting by CAAM or that the manufacturer is just not very accurate in its reporting.

      Reply

  2. Thanks Bart; I noticed that the data duplication problem is not recurring (in other words it looks like it only happened for the months of Jan-Feb.) … so that is good news, it looks like either the OEM or CAAM straightened it out. Maybe they read this valuable blog and comments section ;-).

    Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.